[Husker] BIG 12 NORTH CHAMPIONS

[Mark Landin]

So we lost a game that didn't officially get played?

On 7/12/07, RJ Wessel <da_huskers at cox.net> wrote:
> Our record stays the same - the win was vacated by OU - not a forfiet - only to OU does the game not exist.
>
>
> ---- Mark Landin <marklandin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Except NU's record will likely be 4-3, not 5-3, (as the game
> > officially never happened, rather than NU getting to count that game
> > as a win) and thus a half-game behind CU who didn't play OU that year.
> >
> > I'll wait for the Big12 to declare something before we start
> > speculating on driving to Boulder to pick up our 2005 trophy.
> >
> > On 7/12/07, mark lund <mark.lund at usaprotection.com> wrote:
> > > Nebraska gets the 2005 Big 12 North title, and not Colorado. Now, the
> > > Huskers didn't lose to Oklahoma, so therefore they are given the win on a
> > > forfeit, finish 5-3, and thanks to a 30-3 blowout of the Buffs, are the
> > > official 2005 Big 12 North champions. Unless, Vince Young, and the rest of
> > > the 2005 Longhorns can regroup and play the 2005 Nebraska team for the Big
> > > 12 title, Texas is no longer the official 2005 Big 12 champion. It didn't
> > > beat the North champion.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > husker site list
> > > husker at tssi.com
> > > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "If hard work were such a wonderful thing, you'd think rich people
> > would have kept it all for themselves" - Lane Kirkland
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > husker site list
> > husker at tssi.com
> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
>


-- 
"If hard work were such a wonderful thing, you'd think rich people
would have kept it all for themselves" - Lane Kirkland