[personal] RE: [Husker] Article

[baseballguy at neb.rr.com]

***** ORIGINAL "Steve Stone" <sstone at pvtnetworks.net> MESSAGE 
FOLLOWS *****


My interpretation of the only available evidence so far (Alamo 
Bowl) 
indicates satisfactory performance.

Steve Stone



In response to "Steve Stone" <sstone at pvtnetworks.net> message on 
29-December-2007 4:02:31p

     I know a lot of people use the Alamo Bowl as an example of 
Pelini's Head Coaching ability and it certainly turned out 
successful at least as far as NU winning.  But to me that game 
really is nothing to base anything on at all.  That wasn't Bo's 
players that he recruited to any degree, it wasn't his staff, it 
wasn't his program, and the like.  That was still Solich's team.  
What will be interesting is two or three years from now what  the 
program will be after Bo puts his stamp on it and it is indeed 
his program, his players, his staff, his recruiting, his public 
relations with him as the face of the program, and etc.  That is 
the unknown.  The future is always an unknown to a degree but 
with no track record it is REALLY an unknown.  It may work out 
great and I hope so but who knows at this point?  There are a lot 
of coaches that could take over an already established team the 
last game of the season under an "interim" tag and win a football 
game.  That to me is no indicator of anyone's Head Coaching 
capabilities pro or con.


Sincerely,

Bob Beach

mailto:<baseballguy at neb.rr.com>



_______________________________________________