[Husker] Assistants

[Kaufsss at aol.com]

The guys at Unsportsmanlike Conduct are saying the staff will be 
Offense
Gilmore - TE or WR coach
Watson - OC
Barney Cotton - OL
Ron Brown - WR or TE or RB
Not Hired - RB or somewhere offense
 
Defense
Bo Pelini DC/HC
Carl Pelini
Sanders 
Not Hired - ??Jimmy Williams??/  Linebackers
Not Hired -
 
Also - They say Pelini will coach the Nat Champ Game - but they are  lobbying 
for him to do that only if he is dressed in Husker gear frrom head to  toe!!!!
 
 
 
Steve  Kauf
A Husker fan deep in South Texas
NOT THE VICTORY BUT THE  ACTION
NOT THE GOAL BUT THE GAME
IN THE DEED THE GLORY

 
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 12/3/2007 3:47:39 PM Central Standard Time,  
huskertt at charter.net writes:

I've  mentioned the Yards/Play before, which I believe is the most 
significant  statistic.  The current offense rivals that of Tom Osborne's  
teams.

If you just want to look at Scoring Offense, you can see  that the program is 
on the right track.  If the defense had been at  least mediocre this year, 
the team would have been in the top 10, in my  opinion.

2007 - 28th
2006 - 17th
2005 - 67th
2004 -  58th
2003 - 74th
2002 - 59th
2001 - 7th
2000 - 4th
1999 -  12th
1998 - 23rd
1997 - 1st
1996 - 4th



Tommy  Thompson
"GO BIG RED"
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George  Rapp" <george.rapp at gmail.com>
To: "Huskers List"  <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 7:38 AM
Subject:  Re: [Husker] Assistants


> On Dec 3, 2007 7:59 AM, j j  <jjj112665 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> There is one name there  that I do not want to see as a Nebraska assistant
>> again. That is  Shawn Watson. I do not understand everyones obsession with
>> this  man. Let him go coach somewhere else. What has he done at NU to make 
 
>> so
>> many like him or think he can  coach?
>>
>
> He contributed to a steady rise in the  offensive production, for one
> example.  From  http://d1afootball.com/stat.php, under Total Offense, here 
> is
>  where the 'Huskers ranked:
>
> 2003: 83rd (OC: Norvell)
>  2004: 69th (OC: Norvell)
> 2005: 96th (OC: Norvell)
> 2006: 14th  (OC: Norvell)
> 2007: 11th (OC: Watson)
>
> Of course, this  isn't the statistic that matters -- only the points on the
> board at  the end of the game do -- but it is clearly indicative of an
> improving  trend.  The 2003-05 examples also show the effect of sacking the
>  entire offensive staff.  There is no continuity; players must learn a  new
> offense from scratch; and production suffers.
>
>  OTOH, by keeping Watson as OC, there is at least some continuity and
>  stability for the returning players, and Bo has the chance to keep the
>  offensive production trend going positive, while he concentrates on  fixing
> the defense (which I think we'll all admit was our glaring  problem in 
> 2007).
>
> George
> -- 
>   George Rapp  (Columbus, OH) Home: george.rapp -- at --  gmail.com
>    Work: george.rapp -- at -- eds.com (or)  george.rapp -- at -- dfas.mil
> The object of life is not to be on the  side of the majority, but to escape
>    finding oneself in  the ranks of the insane.  - Marcus Aurelius
>  _______________________________________________
> husker site  list
> husker at tssi.com
>  http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>  


_______________________________________________
husker site  list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker





Steve  Kauf
A Husker fan deep in South Texas
NOT THE VICTORY BUT THE  ACTION
NOT THE GOAL BUT THE GAME
IN THE DEED THE  GLORY



**************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest 
products.
(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)