[Husker] Perlman gives Pederson a vote of confidence

[jonlists at cbsol.com]

Funny that Steve Pederson has such a polarizing effect on everyone. He 
does on me - just about everything the guy does I find aggravating. Maybe 
he understands that, and hasn't been seen publicly as much. It's pretty 
obvious that he's a control freak - if his boss doesn't even know what the 
status of funding is - how the hell is Tom Shatel ever going to get a real 
interview? 

Is that so bad, though? Or is it just different? If it's just different, 
then why does it bother people so much? Do you have to like everyone in 
order to reach the common ground of wanting them to be successful? 

For a few months now, I've been reviewing college football books on my 
blog, and it's something that I'll continue. Over those few months, I've 
learned more about college football history than I've known in the 
previous 44 years, while at the same time gaining a sense that no matter 
who the coach is or what the team is like that the state of Nebraska will 
continue to look to it's football team as a symbol of state pride. 

Whether Steve Pederson is liked or not, succcessful or not, the Huskers 
will go on and I plan to stay rooting for them regardless of who's in 
charge. 

Jon Johnston
http://www.cornnation.com

husker-bounces at tssi.com wrote on 04/18/2007 08:13:20 PM:

> I've been a Husker fan far too long to let transitory phenomena such 
> as current athletes or coaches or athletic directors influence my 
> predilections. When any or all of them have become history, I'll 
> still be Husker-mad.
> 
> Nothing can change that.
> 
> Steve Stone
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker