[Husker] Bad Calls, no defense

Bob Beach rbeach at neb.rr.com
Sun Oct 29 11:18:34 CST 2006



j j wrote:
> Then it would have been unsportsmenlike conduct not unessacary roughness.
>
>
>
> *//*
> <http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=41144/*http://groups.yahoo.com/local/newemail.html>
     You are technically correct.  But, yesterday I wasn't really paying 
any attention to what the Referee signaled.  I was more intent on 
watching what happened on the replays and listening to the announcers.  
Despite what the referee signaled the announcers reported it as 
taunting.  After watching the replays I thought that was reasonable as 
nothing physical happened that was unnecessary and it appeared very 
possibly something was said.  The official also announces verbally what 
the call is and to be honest I can't remember what he said OR signaled.  
When responding yesterday I wasn't even thinking about the difference in 
the calls.  I only was taking into consideration that taunting is a 
penalty.  IF indeed the penalty was for something physical then they 
missed the call.  I don't see how they could have gotten something 
physical out of that but then I don't see how Crouch's helmet turned 
around on his head years ago could be missed either. ;-) :-)


Bob Beach



More information about the husker mailing list