[Husker] Bad Calls, no defense
Bob Beach
rbeach at neb.rr.com
Sat Oct 28 19:50:33 CDT 2006
Dick Karre wrote:
>
> If the call had been for taunting, it would have been unsportsmanlike
> conduct, but it was a personal foul, which means it had to be for
> Purify's hit on the DB. It was a bad call.
To this point you are the only one I know of that feels it wasn't
for taunting. That doesn't mean there aren't others. I just haven't
run into them yet. Maybe it wasn't for taunting but the announcers said
it was for taunting. Obviously, they can be wrong but usually if it is
missed they get a message from the truck to correct it. You, obviously,
have your mind set that it was a bad call and maybe it was. I am not
defending anything. I am just telling you what they said on TV.
Another thing to keep in mind is the official can make the wrong signal
as well. I've officiated enough to know that can indeed happen.
But bad call or no bad call that one call didn't lose the game.
One thing everyone needs to keep in mind is in games NU plays, the other
team has bad calls against them from which NU benefits as well. Things
have a way of evening out. I sometimes am no different but sports fans
in general seem to have the idea there are only bad calls against their
team.
Bob Beach
More information about the husker
mailing list