[Husker] not bad

[Duane Feldman]

I said after the game that we won the battle but the "war" is undecided right now.
 
Bad Oline, no running game, poor field position, limited experience . . . and Freeman still looks like a decent QB.  What happens when those problems are solved?
 
Two weeks ago, I felt Prince was going to destroy the team rather than rebuild it, but now I feel the opposite.  Sometimes you need to take extreme measures to change the complexion of a team and Prince was certainly taking extreme measures.  Their rebound in the face of adversity suggests he might be doing things right.  They lost to us, but they weren't embarrassed and almost looked as good against us as we did against USC.  (No splitting hairs here, both were 18 point losses).
 
I think next year in Lincoln with Keller at the helm, we will be OK, but the next two years are more of a crapshoot vs KSU.
 
Duane Feldman


----- Original Message ----
From: Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net>
To: husker at tssi.com
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 10:59:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Husker] not bad


Derek Ryter wrote:
>  To take ISU and KSU on the road is good regardless of their level of quality, particularly since both teams had
> mobile, play-making QBs and both ended up with one meaningful touchdown.  

I was impressed with young Mr. Freeman. Put a good O-line in front of 
him and he will be a force. I suspect we will get awfully tired of him 
before he's through. And he would have looked so good in red. Pity.

-- 
Dick Karre
dkarre at comcast.net

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker