[Husker] Just what did the Kansas game tell us?

[Theodore Heise]

On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Bob Beach wrote:
> From: "Bob Fancher" <fancherr_2000 at yahoo.com>
>
>> Those days are long gone, even if Tom Osborne had not retired. 
>> There is MUCH more parity in college football than in the past. 
>> Do you miss the days when NU beat up every team on the schedule 
>> by 50 points, except one, and that was a loss to OU? I find 
>> parity much more interesting.
>
>    Tom Osborne was and is a very intelligent man.  Just as much as 
> anything he knew when to get out as a winner.  He could see parity 
> coming.

You may be right, but I'm wondering what makes you think part of Tom 
Osborne's decision to retire was so he could get out as a winner. 
It doesn't sound like what I've seen and read of his character.

-- 
Theodore (Ted) Heise     <theo at heise.nu>     Bloomington, IN, USA