[personal] Re: [Husker] Observations from the stands
Bob Beach
rbeach at neb.rr.com
Sun Oct 1 13:23:14 CDT 2006
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Skylar Dodds" <Sklarbodds at cox.net>
> To: "Husker List" <husker at tssi.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 10:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [personal] Re: [Husker] Observations from the stands
>
>
>> jj> I do have one question for someone on the list. How come the lateral
>> was not a reviewable play? You can review fumbles and catches so why not
>> if a play was a lateral or not? That doesnt make much
>> jj> sense to me.
The other thing about that play is if is the other way it IS reviewable
I believe. In other words if it is judged to be a lateral (on a lateral the
whistle wouldn't blow at that point), the other team recovers and possibly
advances the ball then I believe you can review it to see if it is indeed a
lateral or incomplete pass. Because, then you have the choice to let the
play stand or return it to the original line of scrimmage and treat it like
any other incomplete pass. I don't know if that is correct as far as the
rule book but I could see where that would be a different scenario.
Bob Beach
I have never learned anything when I was doing the talking.
More information about the husker
mailing list