[personal] Re: [Husker] Observations from the stands
Skylar Dodds
Sklarbodds at cox.net
Sun Oct 1 10:02:14 CDT 2006
Hello Husker Fans,
jj> Not trying to pick apart your post but how does Purify coming along nicely fit into the negative catagory? I find that very positive. Also I dont think there was a chance at a moral victory
jj> yesterday. Espically after going up 17-0.
Easily, he fits into the negative category when I'm exhausted after
watching a 5 hour game screaming my head off :)
In other words, oops :)
--
Go Skers,
Skylar mailto:Sklarbodds at cox.net
jj> Skylar,
jj> I do have one question for someone on the list. How come the lateral was not a reviewable play? You can review fumbles and catches so why not if a play was a lateral or not? That doesnt make much
jj> sense to me.
jj> Skylar Dodds <Sklarbodds at cox.net> wrote: Hello Husker Fans,
jj> Great game to be at, probably the loudest I've heard the crowd since
jj> the Eric Crouch throw back catch against OU. I want to say that I
jj> believe 100% that if they had gotten that lateral call right and let
jj> McKeon run for the TD, we'd have blown them out. Instead of 24-10
jj> at half it would have been 31-7 and that would have really defeated
jj> them.
jj> Positive:
jj> 1) I didn't realize Hardy was that fast. On his first touchdown he
jj> looked like he would be knocked out of bounds easily, but he just
jj> turned on the jets and put 10 yards on that guy before he could say,
jj> "Wait for me!"
jj> 2) Shanle had 2 nice interceptions and came close to 2 more.
jj> 3) Great to have Cody Glenn back! Take away his fumble and he
jj> looked VERY good every run.
jj> 4) Zac Taylor - 4 TDs 0 Ints. 395 yards. 26 yards / completion and
jj> over 12 yards per attempt. Sounds like his best game ever? Not
jj> even close :)
jj> 5) Andre Jones didn't look amazing but he was probably the most
jj> improved player IMHO. He really made some big plays when we really
jj> needed them.
jj> Negative:
jj> 1) Line play. Our O-Line was decent but not great and our D-Line
jj> got 100% outplayed. There was almost ZERO pressure on the QB all
jj> game and some big holes to run through.
jj> 2) Defense looked good in spots, but if it weren't for their
jj> turnovers I'd give them an F today. There receivers were running
jj> loose all day and as I said before the pressure was non-existant.
jj> I'd give them a final grade of C.
jj> 3) Purify is coming along nicely. His big body makes him a great
jj> target, especially on 3rd downs
jj> 4) 3 Fumbles made it too close of a game. Period. Take care of the
jj> ball.
jj> 5) Zac Taylor - He was definitely not sharp. A lot of his passes
jj> were to fairly open receivers and he just plain missed them. He
jj> also seemed too obsessed with the long ball. There was 3 times on
jj> one drive where he passed up a WIDE open Herian in the middle of the
jj> field for a receiver down field who was not even open.
jj> OVERALL: If the Huskers win 39-32 their record is 4-1. If they
jj> would have won 56-0 their record would have been 4-1. A win is a
jj> win and moral victories are for losers, glad we didn't have a moral
jj> victory today!
More information about the husker
mailing list