[Husker] Rankings

[Kaufsss at aol.com]

I agree it would be a disaster - but college football is much about emotion  
and Colorado would make the year with a win. Those players that happened to  
like Barnett have something to play for too.  Last years beating  probably sent 
him out the door. 
 Also - that ranking service has Rutgers and Louisville 4 and 5 and  BYU and 
Hawaii 18 and 19.  I'm not convinced Clemson (24)  Nebraska (26) Tennesse(28) 
Texas A&M (30) could not beat any of those  teams. I am predicting a Husker 
Blowout - 40-10, but it would not surprise  me to see it close.  What is the 
weather looking like?   
 
 
 
In a message dated 11/17/2006 11:42:58 AM Central Standard Time,  
rbeach at neb.rr.com writes:


According to these rankings Colorado is the  107th ranked team in the 
country.  That, of course, means there are only  12 teams below them.  NU is ranked 
26th.  A loss to Colorado would  be nothing short of disaster as far as 
National rankings and National  perception.  The Big 12 North is sewed up but a loss 
would have nasty  National  implications.


http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/current_congrove_rankings.html



Bob  Beach

I never learned anything when I was the one doing the  talking.
_______________________________________________
husker site  list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker



 
Steve  Kauf
A Husker fan deep in South Texas
NOT THE VICTORY BUT THE  ACTION
NOT THE GOAL BUT THE GAME
IN THE DEED THE  GLORY