[Husker] Preliminary Game Comments

Mike Jaixen mikejaixen at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 12 11:16:27 CST 2006


I thought going for 2 up 25-21 was the correct call
all along.  Wasn't anybody else a little nervous about
Congdon's extra point at the end of the game?  Thanks
to the 2 pt conversion, it mattered.  And if A&M had
been successful on their first 2-pt conversion and
tied the game at 21, yesterday's game would have gone
to OT.

But no one can complain that the announcers "hated"
Nebraska yesterday.  Anybody else catch the PbP guy
(don't remember his name) yelling out "Look out Zac!"
during the game winning drive?

--- Theodore Heise <theo at heise.nu> wrote:

> On another note, when aTm was driving late in the
> game and trying a 
> field goal, I expected the announcers to reverse
> their earlier 
> pronouncements that going for 2 was pointless when
> up 25-21.  In 
> fact, if aTm had made the field goal, the 2-point
> conversion would 
> have meant Nebraska could not tie with a touchdown
> plus a 2-point 
> conversion.  Once I realized that, the decision to
> go for 2 didn't 
> seem quite as dumb as the announcers had made it out
> to be.
> 
> -- 
> Theodore (Ted) Heise     <theo at heise.nu>    
> Bloomington, IN, USA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> 


Mike Jaixen
Blog: http://huskermike.blogspot.com


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com



More information about the husker mailing list