[Husker] a classic

[Michael Petersen]

It would be much better if it wasn't a constant problem. Can anyone ever 
remember a team that consistently dominated teams in the first half only to 
be completely dominated in the second half. Actually we dominate for 1.75 
quarters, let down a little before half and then struggle in the third and 
fourth.

I see NFL teams do this occasionally but not to this extent. Do we not have 
the killer instinct to put teams away? Do we play too conservativeley with a 
lead. Is it just bad luck???? Maybe  it is just a mental block we need to 
get past. We actually played great defense in the 3rd quarter for 2 downs 
and then gave up horrific plays on 3rd and long.

What does everyone have for reasons?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Derek Ryter" <dryter at inebraska.com>
To: <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 5:08 PM
Subject: [Husker] a classic


> That was much better game than if the huskers had continued to dominate 
> and
> win going away.  That was a great finish.  It will build character to win
> under pressure to clinch the North.
>
>
>
> If anyone wants to talk about coaching, how about sending out a midget to
> cover Purify one-on-one with the game on the line?
>
>
>
> ---------------------
>
> Derek Ryter
>
> Lincoln, NE
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>