[Husker] Matchup vs aTm
jonlists at cbsol.com
jonlists at cbsol.com
Fri Nov 10 12:05:16 CST 2006
A&M played against some pretty bad defenses - so their offensive numbers
are inflated. Of all the defenses they played, only Oklahoma's was in the
top 20. Missouri was next at 37.
Kind of funny how much crap Coach Fran has taken for *not* running Lane
in for a touchdown against Oklahoma last week. Because of that loss, I
would think that A&M's confidence would be a little shaky, ours a little
better.
We need to beat a Big 12 south team to gain some credibility. 0-2 against
the South? Maybe 0-4 on the season? that sucks.
Jon Johnston
http://www.cornnation.com
husker-bounces at tssi.com wrote on 11/10/2006 10:59:48 AM:
> Hello Husker Fans,
>
> Since I'm long winded (as many of you know), I'm going to put a
> summary of my thoughts at the beginning of the email.
>
> I really think we can and will win on Saturday. I think our
> strengths really line up well against theirs. They strength is the
> run, our strength is stopping the run. Their weakness is scoring in
> the red zone, we tend to letup a fair amount of yards, but not that
> many points and so on and so forth.
>
> My Prediction: NU 27 - aTm 13
>
> That being said, we're on the road so logic is thrown out the
> window!
>
> Their defense is solid. They pretty good against the run and not bad
> against the pass.
>
> NU Stat Advantage (Total/Natl Rank/Big XII rank):
> =================================================
> Passing offense: 246.40/23rd/4th 194.50/61st/9th
> Pass efficiency: 167.67/4th/2nd 138.65/32nd/5th
> Total offense: 435.00/10th/2nd 407.20/17th/5th
> Scoring offense: 34.20/12th/3rd 31.30/20th/5th
> Rushing defense: 120.20/45th/4th 128.30/51st/6th
> Pass eff. def.: 115.28/40th/2nd 116.37/44th/4th
> Scoring defense: 17.70/t-30th/t-3rd 18.70/37th/5th
> Punt returns: 9.03/56th/7th 8.53/65th/9th
> Turnover margin: +0.70/20th/2nd +0.50/30th/4th
>
> aTm Stat Advantage (Total/Natl Rank/Big XII rank):
> ==================================================
> Rushing offense: 188.60/17th/3rd 212.70/8th/1st
> Pass defense: 221.90/86th/7th 181.50/38th/4th
> Total defense: 342.10/73rd/8th 309.80/45th/5th
> Net punting: 37.40/22nd/4th 37.68/16th/3rd
> Kickoff returns: 17.89/104th/12th 28.58/2nd/2nd
>
>
> aTm is pretty balanced on defense. They're mid-upper in the big XII
> in every category. I'm guessing Callahan will go with his usual road
> strategy of run first pass, second. OU followed that model and
> escaped with a win (I believe their RB had like 35+ carries).
>
> On offense, aTm is definitely a run first, pass second team. They
> average about 42 rush/game and 25 pass/game. On the season they've
> averaged 5.0 yards per carry and they essentially run 3 different
> running backs regularly (counting the QB).
>
> Goodson is their quick back, he's fast and has a potential to break
> big plays (7.0 yds/carry and 64 yard longest rush). He's 6'0" and
> only 192lbs. He's a Fr to boot, so we'll see him next year too.
>
> Lane (So) is their Mack-Truck back. He does get more carries (127 vs
> 88 for Goodson) but only has a 4.5 yds/rush because of the
> situations he's in. The most glaring stat, however, is Lane has 18
> touchdowns vs 2 for Goodson and 2 for McGee. They will line him up
> when they get down to the goal line and don't apologize for it. He's
> coming, good luck stopping him. For those of you who haven't seen
> aTm this year, he's huge (6'0" 274lbs) but surprisingly agile for
> his size. He is tough to bring down and has pretty good balance.
>
> Their QB caps the rushing attack. He's 6'3" 208 Sophomore who runs a
> 4.5 40, he's a great runner. He averages just under 50 yards per
> game but it would be over 60 if you took out negative yards (sacks).
> He's not all rush though, he's pretty efficient with a 62.6%
> completion and 11 TDs vs 2 Ints. aTm doesn't want him dropping back
> to throw every down, but he's definitely capable. In HS, he set the
> Texas 3A state record for touchdown passes with 101.
>
> Either way, it should be a good matchup. Scoring won't come easy,
> my prediction involves a late touchdown to distance ourselves.
>
> It should make for good television anyway!
>
> --
> Go Skers,
> Skylar mailto:Sklarbodds at cox.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
More information about the husker
mailing list