[Husker] Matchup vs aTm
Skylar Dodds
Sklarbodds at cox.net
Fri Nov 10 10:59:48 CST 2006
Hello Husker Fans,
Since I'm long winded (as many of you know), I'm going to put a
summary of my thoughts at the beginning of the email.
I really think we can and will win on Saturday. I think our
strengths really line up well against theirs. They strength is the
run, our strength is stopping the run. Their weakness is scoring in
the red zone, we tend to letup a fair amount of yards, but not that
many points and so on and so forth.
My Prediction: NU 27 - aTm 13
That being said, we're on the road so logic is thrown out the
window!
Their defense is solid. They pretty good against the run and not bad
against the pass.
NU Stat Advantage (Total/Natl Rank/Big XII rank):
=================================================
Passing offense: 246.40/23rd/4th 194.50/61st/9th
Pass efficiency: 167.67/4th/2nd 138.65/32nd/5th
Total offense: 435.00/10th/2nd 407.20/17th/5th
Scoring offense: 34.20/12th/3rd 31.30/20th/5th
Rushing defense: 120.20/45th/4th 128.30/51st/6th
Pass eff. def.: 115.28/40th/2nd 116.37/44th/4th
Scoring defense: 17.70/t-30th/t-3rd 18.70/37th/5th
Punt returns: 9.03/56th/7th 8.53/65th/9th
Turnover margin: +0.70/20th/2nd +0.50/30th/4th
aTm Stat Advantage (Total/Natl Rank/Big XII rank):
==================================================
Rushing offense: 188.60/17th/3rd 212.70/8th/1st
Pass defense: 221.90/86th/7th 181.50/38th/4th
Total defense: 342.10/73rd/8th 309.80/45th/5th
Net punting: 37.40/22nd/4th 37.68/16th/3rd
Kickoff returns: 17.89/104th/12th 28.58/2nd/2nd
aTm is pretty balanced on defense. They're mid-upper in the big XII
in every category. I'm guessing Callahan will go with his usual road
strategy of run first pass, second. OU followed that model and
escaped with a win (I believe their RB had like 35+ carries).
On offense, aTm is definitely a run first, pass second team. They
average about 42 rush/game and 25 pass/game. On the season they've
averaged 5.0 yards per carry and they essentially run 3 different
running backs regularly (counting the QB).
Goodson is their quick back, he's fast and has a potential to break
big plays (7.0 yds/carry and 64 yard longest rush). He's 6'0" and
only 192lbs. He's a Fr to boot, so we'll see him next year too.
Lane (So) is their Mack-Truck back. He does get more carries (127 vs
88 for Goodson) but only has a 4.5 yds/rush because of the
situations he's in. The most glaring stat, however, is Lane has 18
touchdowns vs 2 for Goodson and 2 for McGee. They will line him up
when they get down to the goal line and don't apologize for it. He's
coming, good luck stopping him. For those of you who haven't seen
aTm this year, he's huge (6'0" 274lbs) but surprisingly agile for
his size. He is tough to bring down and has pretty good balance.
Their QB caps the rushing attack. He's 6'3" 208 Sophomore who runs a
4.5 40, he's a great runner. He averages just under 50 yards per
game but it would be over 60 if you took out negative yards (sacks).
He's not all rush though, he's pretty efficient with a 62.6%
completion and 11 TDs vs 2 Ints. aTm doesn't want him dropping back
to throw every down, but he's definitely capable. In HS, he set the
Texas 3A state record for touchdown passes with 101.
Either way, it should be a good matchup. Scoring won't come easy,
my prediction involves a late touchdown to distance ourselves.
It should make for good television anyway!
--
Go Skers,
Skylar mailto:Sklarbodds at cox.net
More information about the husker
mailing list