[Husker] 15,000!

[BRADALAN at aol.com]

sorry, meant to send this to the whole list the first time. 
 
 
 
In a message dated 1/13/2006 1:09:15 PM Hawaiian Standard Time,  
ldbrown at llu.edu writes:

My guess  is they would barely been able to fill those seats if we had
lost one or  two of the last three ball games.  And 2007 isn't a slam
dunk if we  end up having a losing season next year.



I dont' see much of a dropoff next year on the D, given that the starting  
line looks to be 4 seniors, and there are 5-6 bonafide starters competing at  
LB.  Even losing some of the secondary, most teams won't have much time to  test 
the new starters back there.
 
Given Z. Taylor's strides over the last few games, and the receiving corps,  
the entire season may revolve around the O-line play and the new punter.
 
I don't forsee a losing season next year, neither OSU nor A&M were very  good 
this year, so we should actually fare better against the south, and I see  no 
reason that NU should not win at least 4 games in the north, if not  sweep.
 
I am highly confident that there will be a winning season next year, I  think 
9 wins in the 12 game regular season, maybe 10-11, especially if the  Huskers 
could pull a huge early upset at USC before their new offensive players  gel.
 
GBR!!!
 
Brad Bredenkamp