[Husker] Cousin Rich, the sequel

[Scott Daehling]

Why doesn't the guy just subscribe to the list and he can speak for himself?
Unless this is just a strawman.... 

-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf Of
jonlists at cbsol.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:18 PM
To: Derek Ryter
Cc: husker at tssi.com; husker-bounces at tssi.com
Subject: RE: [Husker] Cousin Rich, the sequel

Why? is there something else more pressing? It's not like people are having
a hard time in keeping up with the list. 

I think the guy made some points - why didn't we play the nickel more this
year - which Jeff Volk responded to. 

Why was our defense ranked so poorly at the end of the year, it's finishing
up stuff. Or do you just want to forget all of it? 

Jon Johnston
http://www.cornnation.com

husker-bounces at tssi.com wrote on 12/11/2006 10:11:17 PM:

> Please, for the love of God, ditch these threads!
> 
> ---------------------
> Derek Ryter
> Lincoln, NE
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On
Behalf
> > Of Kaufsss at aol.com
> > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 9:40 PM
> > To: husker at tssi.com
> > Subject: Re: [Husker] Cousin Rich, the sequel
> > 
> > Not exactly sure why we are even discussing this - Cousin Rich (and 
> > by association Bill) are just drive by flamers of one sense or 
> > another -
post
> > a
> > highly charged email from someone 'with much more knowledge than I'-
say I
> > won't
> > respond to anyone's comments because I am off board - then magically 
> > reappear to  come down to our level and respond to some comments 
> > about his
flame!!!
> > Then say - sorry, I'll go back in my hole now!!  OK bye!
> > 
> > 
> > Steve  Kauf
> > A Husker fan deep in South Texas
> > NOT THE VICTORY BUT THE  ACTION
> > NOT THE GOAL BUT THE GAME
> > IN THE DEED THE GLORY
> > 
> > weldoc at juno.com wrote:
> > >
> > > (Caution: sarcasm employed--proceed  at your own risk...[brackets] 
> > > indicate editing to tone down the  invective...so as not to hurt 
> > > anyone's feelings)
> > >
> > > Bill:  I don't know how you can stand to read what some of these 
> > > [geniuses]  have to say !!
> > 
> > Hey, can I play too?
> > How about this one:   Bill is a [jerk].  Did I get that right?
> > 
> > > Yes, we stopped  the run
> > 
> > Yes, we stopped the vaunted Oklahoma running game.
> > 
> > >  and gave up 265 yards thru the air
> > 
> > So what?  We only gave up 14  points (to a Top 10 team).
> > 
> > > I don't think Zac Taylor calls the plays  and forgets about 
> > > running the ball the last 25 minutes of the  game.
> > 
> > Who exactly was supposed to carry the ball for the last
> > 25  minutes?  Brandon was gone.  Marlon had a bad back and was too  
> > important to the passing game to risk pounding the rock.  Cody, I  
> > believe, had some sort of injury.  Kenny played for a short while, 
> > but  didn't play well.
> > 
> > Besides, we were down by 14 points for the entire  4th quarter.  We 
> > naturally looked to the passing game for some quick  scores.
> > 
> > > Zac Taylor admitted that he was confused by OU's  defense.
> > > That is coaching and scheming.
> > 
> > Please.  Zac  is confused, and you blame it on the coaches?
> > Zac is a big boy.   He's watched the film.  He's done the
> > reps.  He carries the  can.
> > 
> > When Zac plays well, we justifiably sing his praises -- Zac gets  
> > the credit, not the coaching and scheming.  So when Zac plays 
> > poorly,  the blame goes on him, not on the coaching and scheming.
> > 
> > > Again,  against our defense, it would have been 6, because the 
> > > safety would not  have been around to make the int.
> > 
> > It's amazing.  Our defense was so  bad, yet Oklahoma was only able 
> > to score 14 points on them.
> > 
> > > It  tells you how [ridiculous] our defensive coaching is!
> > 
> > I don't know  why you guys want to keep rehashing this [crap].
> > We did not lose to Oklahoma  because of our [ridiculous] defense.  
> > We lost because Purify fumbled in  the first minute.
> > We lost because Zac turned the ball over four times.
> > 
> > > So quit [complaining] about the players and focus on the  real 
> > > problem - coaching!
> > 
> > Turnovers lost us the game.  It wasn't the  coaches; it wasn't the 
> > gameplan.  We out-yarded Oklahoma on the  ground.  We out- yarded 
> > them in the air.  Our defense held them to  14 points.
> > The game was ours for the taking.  The fact that we  fumbled the 
> > game away is not the fault of the coaches.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Steve  Kauf
> > A Husker fan deep in South Texas
> > NOT THE VICTORY BUT THE  ACTION
> > NOT THE GOAL BUT THE GAME
> > IN THE DEED THE  GLORY
> > _______________________________________________
> > husker site list
> > husker at tssi.com
> > http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker