[Husker] Cousin Rich, the sequel

[Derek Ryter]

Please, for the love of God, ditch these threads!

---------------------
Derek Ryter
Lincoln, NE

> -----Original Message-----
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf
> Of Kaufsss at aol.com
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 9:40 PM
> To: husker at tssi.com
> Subject: Re: [Husker] Cousin Rich, the sequel
> 
> Not exactly sure why we are even discussing this - Cousin Rich (and by
> association Bill) are just drive by flamers of one sense or another - post
> a
> highly charged email from someone 'with much more knowledge than I'- say I
> won't
> respond to anyone's comments because I am off board - then magically
> reappear
> to  come down to our level and respond to some comments about his flame!!!
> Then say - sorry, I'll go back in my hole now!!  OK bye!
> 
> 
> Steve  Kauf
> A Husker fan deep in South Texas
> NOT THE VICTORY BUT THE  ACTION
> NOT THE GOAL BUT THE GAME
> IN THE DEED THE GLORY
> 
> weldoc at juno.com wrote:
> >
> > (Caution: sarcasm employed--proceed  at your own risk...[brackets]
> > indicate editing to tone down the  invective...so as not to hurt
> > anyone's feelings)
> >
> > Bill:  I don't know how you can stand to read what some of
> > these [geniuses]  have to say !!
> 
> Hey, can I play too?
> How about this one:   Bill is a [jerk].  Did I get that right?
> 
> > Yes, we stopped  the run
> 
> Yes, we stopped the vaunted Oklahoma running game.
> 
> >  and gave up 265 yards thru the air
> 
> So what?  We only gave up 14  points (to a Top 10 team).
> 
> > I don't think Zac Taylor calls the plays  and forgets
> > about running the ball the last 25 minutes of the  game.
> 
> Who exactly was supposed to carry the ball for the last
> 25  minutes?  Brandon was gone.  Marlon had a bad back
> and was too  important to the passing game to risk
> pounding the rock.  Cody, I  believe, had some sort of
> injury.  Kenny played for a short while, but  didn't
> play well.
> 
> Besides, we were down by 14 points for the entire  4th
> quarter.  We naturally looked to the passing game for
> some quick  scores.
> 
> > Zac Taylor admitted that he was confused by OU's  defense.
> > That is coaching and scheming.
> 
> Please.  Zac  is confused, and you blame it on the coaches?
> Zac is a big boy.   He's watched the film.  He's done the
> reps.  He carries the  can.
> 
> When Zac plays well, we justifiably sing his praises --
> Zac gets  the credit, not the coaching and scheming.  So
> when Zac plays poorly,  the blame goes on him, not on the
> coaching and scheming.
> 
> > Again,  against our defense, it would have been 6, because
> > the safety would not  have been around to make the int.
> 
> It's amazing.  Our defense was so  bad, yet Oklahoma was
> only able to score 14 points on them.
> 
> > It  tells you how [ridiculous] our defensive coaching is!
> 
> I don't know  why you guys want to keep rehashing this [crap].
> We did not lose to Oklahoma  because of our [ridiculous]
> defense.  We lost because Purify fumbled in  the first minute.
> We lost because Zac turned the ball over four times.
> 
> > So quit [complaining] about the players and focus on the
> >  real problem - coaching!
> 
> Turnovers lost us the game.  It wasn't the  coaches; it wasn't
> the gameplan.  We out-yarded Oklahoma on the  ground.  We out-
> yarded them in the air.  Our defense held them to  14 points.
> The game was ours for the taking.  The fact that we  fumbled
> the game away is not the fault of the coaches.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Steve  Kauf
> A Husker fan deep in South Texas
> NOT THE VICTORY BUT THE  ACTION
> NOT THE GOAL BUT THE GAME
> IN THE DEED THE  GLORY
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker