[Husker] My Take On The Game and the Defense

[Michael Petersen]

Is there an echo in here? : )

Is it necessary to blame anyone? I'm saying that if we had run the ball 
occasionally, it would have kept their defense guessing and allowed our 
passing game to be more effective.

If anyone is standing in the shotgun and everyone in the stadium knows he is 
going to throw the ball, completing 46% might be pretty dadgummed good.

Mike
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <3aoo-cvfd at dea.spamcon.org>
To: <f3ds-sf6u at dea.spamcon.org>
Cc: "Husker List" <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Husker] My Take On The Game and the Defense


> Michael Petersen wrote:
>>
>> Zac shouldn't have been expected to throw 50 passes.
>
> Zac wouldn't have had to throw 50 passes if he'd connected
> on more of them.  His completion rate was just 46%.  Plus
> he threw three interceptions.  Plus he fumbled the ball.
>
>> Don't blame Zac for the offense that day.
>
> Who else should we blame?
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>