[Husker] the D

[3aoo-cvfd at dea.spamcon.org]

Matt wrote:
>
> FWIW, I totally appreciated "Cousin Rich's Rant", and I thought Steve
> Stone's reply was kind of immature and pretty pointless.

Funny that.  I totally appreciated Steve Stone's reply.
I though "Cousin Rich's Rant" was immature and pointless.
 
> Maybe it's because I agree with Cousin Rich.  

Maybe it's because I agree with Steve Stone.

> Or to notice that 10+ different WRs have had career days against 
> Nebraska this year.

So what?  We stop the run and they pass more.  We stuffed the
vaunted Oklahoma rushing attack (42 yards total!) and they
passed more than usual (265 yards).  Did one of their WR get
a career day?  I don't care.  Our defense gave up just 14 points
to a Top Ten team.
    
> Or to note how Fabian & the Bullocks Brothers may have under-
> performed at Nebraska, given that they now start on Sundays.

And you're going to criticize the coaches for that?  Surely,
you could equally praise the coaches for getting them to the
NFL.
 
> We've got some great talent coming on board and I want them 
> to fulfill their potential.  

You can lead a horse to water...
Harrison Beck had lots of stars, but he was useless.
Blame the coaches if you want -- I blame Harrison.

> BTW - is there any validity to Rich's claims about our 
> coverages being "high school"?

No.