[Husker] the D

[3aoo-cvfd at dea.spamcon.org]

Steve Reichenbach wrote:
>
> if there was any substance to Steve Stone's post amidst
> it's uninformative name calling and insults, I missed it.

I liked Steve Stone's post.

> It appears to me that Steve Stone, not liking a critical 
> analysis, responsed with a personalized diatribe.

It certainly didn't appear that way to me.  If anyone is
guilty of "personalized diatribe", it is you.

> Mr. Stone's churlish response

More personalized diatribe.

> I am not an expert at football

You're not the only non-expert posting here.

> I appreciate hearing substantive arguments on both sides
> of this issue --- why NU's defensive schemes and gameplans
> are good or why NU's defensive schemes and gameplans are bad.

Yeah, I love all the carping criticism from you non-experts.

> Such namecalling typically ends substantive discussions 

So why are you attacking Steve Stone?

> why don't you explain why those criticisms are mistaken, 
> instead of responding with nothing but ad hominem attacks.

Why don't you?

> I look forward to your analysis.

Yes please, more anaylysis.  
And less mindless criticism from non-experts.