[Husker] BCS - Am I alone?

[j j]

That right there is my point exactly. Would Ohio St. be #1 if they had started out at #50 in the polls? They started at or near #1 and stayed there. Did they play a tough enough schedule to vault to #1 if they had started lower? They only played two teams that are currently ranked (Texas and MU). 
If you had an eight team playoff and just took the top eight regardless of conference they would be: Ohio St, Florida, Michigan, LSU, Louisville, Wisconsin, OU, USC. Sounds like a pretty good playoff to me. 
One thing the pro-bowlers are forgetting is that in todays system when you lose matters all most as much as to whom. If Florida had went into the SEC championship game undefeated and lost they would not have a chance to play in the MNC game but since they lost a month ago they are there. How is that fair? How does that guarentee that the two best are playing in the last game? 




J1a2c3k at aol.com wrote: In a message dated 12/5/2006 10:57:08 P.M.  Eastern Standard Time, 
jjj112665 at yahoo.com writes:
That is just the opinion  of some human voters and a mix of imperfect  
computers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------   
A few years ago, one of the Dayton sports writers, who was a voter, [when I  
asked about his voting] said he'd always use his vote for the Ohio State no  
matter how they were doing.
 
Jack K. 

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker


 
---------------------------------
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.