[personal] Re: [Husker] BCS - Am I alone?

[Skylar Dodds]

Hello Husker Fans,

While I definitely agree with your post and anything that slights the
Pac-10, Big-10 or Independents can't be all that bad, one might argue
that the current system slighted the Big 10 a little (Michigan not
playing hurt them while Florida gained from having an extra game).

Just FYI.

-- 
Go Skers,
 Skylar                            mailto:Sklarbodds at cox.net

ML> On 12/5/06, Tom Risor <Huskermn at mac.com> wrote:
>> For a LONG time, I was one of those 'WE NEED A PLAYOFF' people.  As I've
>> aged, I've found I prefer the current 'system'.
>>
>> I think the BCS is better than it was before and can still be tweaked
>> even more.

ML> I think one of the "tweaks" that should be made is an additional .1 or
ML> .2 bonus for winning your conference championship game. The teams
ML> which must play in one take an additional risk, and should be suitably
ML> rewarded, and removes the slight advantage that PAC-10, Big 10, and
ML> independents have in not having to play one more "probably good" team
ML> before getting their bowl spots.

ML> _______________________________________________
ML> husker site list
ML> husker at tssi.com
ML> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker