[Husker] question about pitt game

[Sean McGrath]

I must give credit to Wanstadt (SP?) who said that it shouldn't have
been a penalty for running onto the field. 

Sean

-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com] On Behalf
Of Skylar Dodds
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 2:27 AM
To: husker at tssi.com
Subject: Re: [Husker] question about pitt game

I don't think that delay of game would be right.  MANY teams have rushed
the field after they thought time had expired, but they are never
called.  I'd have to watch the replay again for the late hit, but I
don't recall it.

Skylar

-----Original Message-----
    From: "Mike Jaixen"<mikejaixen at yahoo.com>
    Sent: 9/27/05 11:04:05 AM
    To: "husker at tssi.com"<husker at tssi.com>
    Subject: Re: [Husker] question about pitt game
    
    In all the confusion, the officials did not call any
    of the penalties that could have been called.  Pitt
    could have been called for intentional grounding, but
    the Huskers could have also been called for Roughing
    the passer for decking the kicker well after he threw
    the pass.  They also could have been flagged for
    unsportsmanlike conduct or delay of game when the
    entire team rushed the field when there was still :01
    still on the clock. 
    
    --- "T.B." <balfour at NOSPAMgrandecom.net> wrote:
    
    > i just finished watching a taped version of the pitt
    > game and was wondering
    > why intentional grounding wasn't called on that
    > botched field goal attempt
    > at the end of the game.
    > 
    > it didn't look like there was any sort of receiver
    > in the area, and the
    > player who threw the ball didn't seem to be outside
    > of the tackles.
    > 
    > anyone?
    > 
    

[Message truncated. Tap Edit->Mark for Download to get remaining
portion.]

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker