[Husker] Re: question about pitt game (fwd)
j j
jjj112665 at yahoo.com
Wed Sep 28 07:40:10 CDT 2005
Maybe not to consult the rule book but to consult with
each other to make sure they had the call right...
Yes. I have seen this at all levels of play, from Jr.
High to the pros. Both before and after replay. I do
agree though that the only thing that could have been
reviewed would have been the clock.
--- Mike Nolan <nolan at romaine.tssi.com> wrote:
> >
>
http://www.big12sports.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/footbl-instant-replay
> > .html), it's possible that both were valid reasons
> to review.
>
> The pass itself wasn't illegal. I don't see
> 'ineligible receiver
> downfield' or 'intentional grounding' on that list.
> As I recall, the
> ball wasn't touched by anybody, so 'touched by an
> ineligible reciever'
> would not appear to apply.
>
> What situation would apply?
>
> I'm curious to know if the snapped ball hitting the
> holder in the head and
> being caught by the kicker qualifies as a fumble.
> It isn't a pass yet,
> so it isn't a tipped pass.
>
> Has anyone ever seen a Division 1A game stopped
> while the officials
> consult the rulebook?
>
> I disagree that the clock operator did anything
> wrong. Had time expired
> I think the officials could have reviewed THAT.
> --
> Mike Nolan
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the husker
mailing list