[Husker] question about pitt game

jonlists at cbsol.com jonlists at cbsol.com
Tue Sep 27 09:55:20 CDT 2005


because they missed the call. Intentional grounding would have been the 
right call. 

unfortunately, there was a lot going on at the time. <G>

Jon Johnston
Creative Business Solutions
IBM, Microsoft, Novell/Suse, Sophos Consultants
http://www.cbsol.com
blog:http://bingo.cbsol.com
This message sent using Firefox on OS X through Lotus Domino 7

husker-bounces at tssi.com wrote on 09/27/2005 01:11:39 AM:

> i just finished watching a taped version of the pitt game and was 
wondering
> why intentional grounding wasn't called on that botched field goal 
attempt
> at the end of the game.
> 
> it didn't look like there was any sort of receiver in the area, and the
> player who threw the ball didn't seem to be outside of the tackles.
> 
> anyone?
> 
> TB in Austin
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker



More information about the husker mailing list