[Husker] question about pitt game
jonlists at cbsol.com
jonlists at cbsol.com
Tue Sep 27 09:55:20 CDT 2005
because they missed the call. Intentional grounding would have been the
right call.
unfortunately, there was a lot going on at the time. <G>
Jon Johnston
Creative Business Solutions
IBM, Microsoft, Novell/Suse, Sophos Consultants
http://www.cbsol.com
blog:http://bingo.cbsol.com
This message sent using Firefox on OS X through Lotus Domino 7
husker-bounces at tssi.com wrote on 09/27/2005 01:11:39 AM:
> i just finished watching a taped version of the pitt game and was
wondering
> why intentional grounding wasn't called on that botched field goal
attempt
> at the end of the game.
>
> it didn't look like there was any sort of receiver in the area, and the
> player who threw the ball didn't seem to be outside of the tackles.
>
> anyone?
>
> TB in Austin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
More information about the husker
mailing list