[Husker] West Coast Offense? (fwd)

[Andy Knipp]

yea but 10-3 is horrible if you lose 3 blowouts.

If NUs schedule was not so freaking weak,  another
sub 500 season would really be likely.  Even with the B12 N
being poor. it will be close

-----Original Message-----
From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com]On Behalf
Of scott71law at verizon.net
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 8:44 PM
To: Dick Karre; husker at romaine.tssi.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Husker] West Coast Offense? (fwd)


 From: Dick Karre <dkarre at comcast.net>
Date: Sat Sep 17 19:39:28 CDT 2005
To: husker at romaine.tssi.com
Subject: Re: [Husker] West Coast Offense? (fwd)

there are no sure things on the
schedule, unless the offense improves
mightily - and soon.

Dick Karre
dkarre at comcast.net


This is the third week in a row I have read this comment from at least one
of the listers. To me, 3-0 is 3-0, I couldn't care less how they get them.

The thing I found most disturbing however, was the look on Callahan's face
after the FG attempt was blocked as time expired. Talk about not acting like
you've been there before, holy crap!

I will never listen to "biased" commentary on how great a Husker QB looks
again- after believing all the hype on Taylor, he looks lost to me, ala
Dailey all over again. At least this kid seems to be able to make the throws
Dailey could not. If ISU and Tech come in and walk all over the Huskers,
Callahan may want to consider putting Harrison Beck through the old Troy
Aikman treatment (fed to the wolves in Dallas but gaining HUGE amounts of
experience in the process).

Scott in NY
_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker

_______________________________________________
husker site list
husker at tssi.com
http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker