[personal] Re: [Husker] 2006 Div 1-AA opponents
Skylar Dodds
Sklarbodds at cox.net
Wed Nov 23 18:28:40 CST 2005
Actually, you're mistaken.
If you take out the Div I-AA team and we lose to Colorado, we'd be
5-5, which would still make us bowl-eligible. You must be .500 or
above to be bowl-eligible.
--
Thanks,
Skylar
mailto:Sklarbodds at cox.net
Hello Pat,
Wednesday, November 23, 2005, 2:06:11 PM, you wrote:
PG> Mark J Norris wrote:
>>NU could have TWO 1-AA games next year. Pencil in Nicholls State as one of them
>>
>>http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_pg=38&u_sid=2070606&u_rnd=2481392
>>
>>
PG> Are we going to play 11 or 12 regular season games next year?
PG> Supposedly, teams will be able to add a 12th game to their schedule
PG> starting next year, but I don't think it's mandatory. Two 1-AA
PG> opponents + USC + the conference schedule = 11 regular season games.
PG> Here's another thought...If we lose to Colorado on Friday, we'll be
PG> forced to count our victory over 1-AA Maine toward bowl eligbility. It
PG> used to be that you could only do this once every four seasons. If we
PG> schedule *two* 1-AA opponents next year, then I don't think either one
PG> of those victories will count toward bowl eligibility. That would
PG> indicate that NU needs to go 7-4 in 2006 just to become bowl eligible!
PG> (Removing the two 1-AA victories would put us at 5-4, the minimum for a
PG> winning record). With games against USC, Texas, Colorado, @Iowa State,
PG> @Texas A&M, that might be easier said than done!
PG> If Stevey is padding the schedule to inflate our record, he might want
PG> to add a low-rung 1-A team instead. I have no idea how up-to-date this
PG> website is, but the following teams still appear to have open slots for
PG> non-conference opponents:
PG> Western Michigan
PG> http://www.inside99.net/NCAA/future_schedules/westernmichigan_future.htm
PG> Louisiana Tech
PG> http://www.inside99.net/NCAA/future_schedules/louisianatech_future.htm
PG> (maybe September 9th would work?)
PG> Akron
PG> http://www.inside99.net/NCAA/future_schedules/akron_future.htm
PG> (September 16th?)
PG> Some of them might demand a home-and-home rather than just a one-game
PG> deal, but I hope those avenues have at least been explored. I wonder if
PG> any other team has yet to officially schedule more than one conference
PG> schedule?
PG> _______________________________________________
PG> husker site list
PG> husker at tssi.com
PG> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
More information about the husker
mailing list