[Husker] No. 1 and No. 26 teams competing any Husker fans notice?
jonlists at cbsol.com
jonlists at cbsol.com
Sat Nov 5 16:53:29 CST 2005
Washington just swept Stanford, beating them twice for the first time
ever.
It was on Fox Sports..... thought I'd watch that for a bit, take my mind
off football. <G>
Jon Johnston
http://www.huskerjon.com
husker-bounces at tssi.com wrote on 11/05/2005 02:47:35 AM:
>
> WARNING: If you don't care about Volleyball, stop here.
>
> Washington is very sharp, as I saw when the swept the Wahine twice in
> Hawaii. Against Hawaii their digs were amazing, but Dave Shoji was
still
> struggling to find the right chemistry for the Wahine as Mason and a
> couple of others
> were coming back from early-season injuries.
>
> I don't know about breadth of offense at UW, but Nebraska has an amazing
> array of weapons: Pavan, Elmer, Larson, Houghtalling, Stalls,
Saleamua...I
> don't know that UW is quite that diverse.
>
> If you look at schedules, Nebraska has faced 8 ranked opponents (at the
time
> of the game) and swept 6 of them. 5 of their first 10 opponents were
> ranked. They opened against the cream of the NCAA, except for UW,
> and dominated
> everyone. They swept Penn State and Stanford, who are still #3 and#4.
The
> only reason they went five games against Minnesota (at Minnesota)
> was that they
> went to sleep in game 3 when they were about 5 points from a sweep and
let
> the Gophers get some momentum. They have dropped exactly 1 (ONE)
> game at home
> (including the Qwest center in Omaha). They also swept Ohio State and
> Michigan on the road. Ohio State is now ranked #19, which makes 9
ranked
> opponents. The Huskers still have to play Missouri, Texas, and
> Kansas state again,
> which will give them 12 ranked opponents. Colorado is #27 as of
> last week, so
> with a few wins they could be ranked by the Nov 23rd match as well.
>
> On the other hand, Washington swept 8 nobodies in a row before catching
> Hawaii when they were down and reeling from injuries and losses to
> Nebraska and
> Penn State. They have played 8 games against 5 ranked opponents (Cal,
USC,
> UCLA, Arizona, Stanford) They have gone 5 games 3 times and droppedone
game
> to Stanford (NU swept). They play all of these teams twice, which will
give
> them 10 ranked opponents on the season. The rest of the Pac 10 is off
the
> radar.
>
> Nebraska's 8 opponents who are still in the top 25 have a combined 27
losses
> to teams other than Nebraska, for an average of 3.375. If you add
Colorado,
> it goes to 33 and an average of 3.67. Washington's 6 opponents whoare
still
> in the top 25 have a combined 24 losses to teams other than Washington,
for
> an average of 4.0. Statistically speaking this could be taken as an
> indication that Nebraska's opponents as a group are better than
> Washington's. And
> therefore the Huskers have a tougher schedule. Nebraska also has a
higher
> winning percentage (in games, not matches) against common
> opponents. Nebraska is
> 1.000 with 6 wins and zero losses against Hawaii and Stanford.
> Washington is
> at .923 with 6 wins and zero losses against Hawaii, and 6 wins but 1
loss
> against Stanford.
>
> Does any of this really mean anything about which team is better?
Probably
> not, but I haven't had this much fun comparing undefeated teams since NU
and
> Penn State in football in 1994, and NU/Michigan in 1997. Sure is
> refreshing.
> Thanks Buckley!
>
> By the way, my daughter went to the Wahine camp this summer, her first
year
> in the sport. We have been to a number of their games and kind of
adopted
> them to cheer for since we obviously can't go to any Husker games.
> We really
> enjoy watching them and I hope they do well in the tournament, as
> long as they
> don't play the Huskers!
>
> GO BIG RED!!! (All of them!)
>
> Brad Bredenkamp
>
>
> In a message dated 11/4/2005 10:41:43 AM Hawaiian Standard Time,
> buckley at hawaii.edu writes:
>
> Washington is the scarier team out there. They swept Hawaii TWICE at
> Hawaii, few teams do that. They've swept Stanford and beaten them
again.
> The Pac 10 is probably a slightly stronger conference than the Big 12
so
> their game has to stay sharp.
>
> Hawaii isn't going to do it this year. They over performed last year
and
> this year fell back to probably where they should have been last year.
The
> WAC (weak athletic conference) really hurts them competitively.
Nebraska's
> third string line up would probably go undefeated in the WAC.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
More information about the husker
mailing list