[Husker] No. 1 and No. 26 teams competing any Husker fans notice?
BRADALAN at aol.com
BRADALAN at aol.com
Sat Nov 5 02:47:35 CST 2005
WARNING: If you don't care about Volleyball, stop here.
Washington is very sharp, as I saw when the swept the Wahine twice in
Hawaii. Against Hawaii their digs were amazing, but Dave Shoji was still
struggling to find the right chemistry for the Wahine as Mason and a couple of others
were coming back from early-season injuries.
I don't know about breadth of offense at UW, but Nebraska has an amazing
array of weapons: Pavan, Elmer, Larson, Houghtalling, Stalls, Saleamua...I
don't know that UW is quite that diverse.
If you look at schedules, Nebraska has faced 8 ranked opponents (at the time
of the game) and swept 6 of them. 5 of their first 10 opponents were
ranked. They opened against the cream of the NCAA, except for UW, and dominated
everyone. They swept Penn State and Stanford, who are still #3 and #4. The
only reason they went five games against Minnesota (at Minnesota) was that they
went to sleep in game 3 when they were about 5 points from a sweep and let
the Gophers get some momentum. They have dropped exactly 1 (ONE) game at home
(including the Qwest center in Omaha). They also swept Ohio State and
Michigan on the road. Ohio State is now ranked #19, which makes 9 ranked
opponents. The Huskers still have to play Missouri, Texas, and Kansas state again,
which will give them 12 ranked opponents. Colorado is #27 as of last week, so
with a few wins they could be ranked by the Nov 23rd match as well.
On the other hand, Washington swept 8 nobodies in a row before catching
Hawaii when they were down and reeling from injuries and losses to Nebraska and
Penn State. They have played 8 games against 5 ranked opponents (Cal, USC,
UCLA, Arizona, Stanford) They have gone 5 games 3 times and dropped one game
to Stanford (NU swept). They play all of these teams twice, which will give
them 10 ranked opponents on the season. The rest of the Pac 10 is off the
radar.
Nebraska's 8 opponents who are still in the top 25 have a combined 27 losses
to teams other than Nebraska, for an average of 3.375. If you add Colorado,
it goes to 33 and an average of 3.67. Washington's 6 opponents who are still
in the top 25 have a combined 24 losses to teams other than Washington, for
an average of 4.0. Statistically speaking this could be taken as an
indication that Nebraska's opponents as a group are better than Washington's. And
therefore the Huskers have a tougher schedule. Nebraska also has a higher
winning percentage (in games, not matches) against common opponents. Nebraska is
1.000 with 6 wins and zero losses against Hawaii and Stanford. Washington is
at .923 with 6 wins and zero losses against Hawaii, and 6 wins but 1 loss
against Stanford.
Does any of this really mean anything about which team is better? Probably
not, but I haven't had this much fun comparing undefeated teams since NU and
Penn State in football in 1994, and NU/Michigan in 1997. Sure is refreshing.
Thanks Buckley!
By the way, my daughter went to the Wahine camp this summer, her first year
in the sport. We have been to a number of their games and kind of adopted
them to cheer for since we obviously can't go to any Husker games. We really
enjoy watching them and I hope they do well in the tournament, as long as they
don't play the Huskers!
GO BIG RED!!! (All of them!)
Brad Bredenkamp
In a message dated 11/4/2005 10:41:43 AM Hawaiian Standard Time,
buckley at hawaii.edu writes:
Washington is the scarier team out there. They swept Hawaii TWICE at
Hawaii, few teams do that. They've swept Stanford and beaten them again.
The Pac 10 is probably a slightly stronger conference than the Big 12 so
their game has to stay sharp.
Hawaii isn't going to do it this year. They over performed last year and
this year fell back to probably where they should have been last year. The
WAC (weak athletic conference) really hurts them competitively. Nebraska's
third string line up would probably go undefeated in the WAC.
More information about the husker
mailing list