[Husker] North

[Mike and Kelly Petersen]

Yes,  I too see a very real possibility of us having a losing and possibly
worse record than last year.

If this happens, it is not because of our talent level. We had the talent to
be 8-3 last year. I will concede that all of the changes last year cost us
several games.

If we have a losing season next year, with the schedule we have, talent is
not the problem. Coaching is.

Personally I think these guys are winners and will turn things around. If
there are no improvements, then I am wrong.

Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Beach <rbeach at neb.rr.com>
To: <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Husker] North


> Steve Reichenbach wrote:
>
> >
> >A winning record?  Give me a break.  With the schedule they have this
> >year, I'd say anything worse than 8-3 in the regular season will be
> >disappointing.  A record of 6-5 and Callahan and Pederson go on the
> >watch list for 2006.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> 09/03 Maine <http://huskerpedia.com/games/2005/maine05.html>
> 09/10 Wake Forest <http://huskerpedia.com/games/2005/wakeforest05.html>
> 09/17 Pittsburgh <http://huskerpedia.com/games/2005/pittsburgh05.html>
> 10/01 Iowa State <http://huskerpedia.com/games/2005/iowastate05.html>
> 10/08 Texas Tech <http://huskerpedia.com/games/2005/textech05.html>
> 10/15 @ Baylor <http://huskerpedia.com/games/2005/baylor05.html>
> 10/22 @ Missouri <http://huskerpedia.com/games/2005/mizzou05.html>
> 10/29 Oklahoma <http://huskerpedia.com/games/2005/oklahoma05.html>
> 11/05 @ Kansas <http://huskerpedia.com/games/2005/kansas05.html>
> 11/12 Kansas State <http://huskerpedia.com/games/2005/ksu05.html>
> 11/25 @ Colorado <http://huskerpedia.com/games/2005/colo05.html>
>
>
>
>      I am sure there are smarter people out there than me, including
> you.  I could maybe see 8-3 but I could envision 4-7 or 5-6 as well.
> When I look at the schedule I only see two "sure" or "automatic" wins.
> That being Maine and Baylor.  All things being equal Pittsburgh and Wake
> Forest are likely wins but not "sure" wins.  As far as I can tell the
> rest are toss ups except Oklahoma.  Kansas is improved so I don't see
> anything easy about going to Missouri, Kansas, and Colorado.  Unless the
> Huskers play way above their capabilities and Oklahoma doesn't show that
> one is most likely a loss.  K-State and Texas Tech should be solid
> again, maybe not great but solid and at least one publication believes
> Iowa State is good enough to win the division.  So yeah, a winning
> record would be great after last year in my estimation.  I do agree with
> you 8-3 is a possibility that is there.  I want at least that but I am
> not going to be disappointed with less as long as it is over .500.  All
> these new recruits aren't going to be great right away.
>
>
> Bob Beach
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>