[Husker] CU slush fund

[Dick Karre]

As I understand the NCAA rules, the "death penalty" is reserved for programs
found guilty of a second major offense within a certain period of time. I
don't think CU has the first offense on the books yet. I have to wonder if
Barnett can survive this. If nothing else, canning him might divert
attention from the Ward Churchill fiasco.
Dick Karre
dkarre at comcast.net
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Russ Volberding" <russvolb at earthlink.net>
To: <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 5:17 AM
Subject: Fwd: Re: [Husker] CU slush fund


> If I had a choice in dealing with either the NCAA or the IRS I would
choose
> the former in a heartbeat.  The IRS might check into individuals
activities
> but would they investigate the institution?  Weren't there some
> Congressional hearings that questioned some aspects of Colorado's
> program?  Perhaps as a part of a larger inquiry?
> In any case my "loss of institutional control" remark was inferring a
> possible NCAA "death penalty" like what happened to SMU.  Such a ruling
> could really hurt the Big XII.
>
>
> >Russ,
> >
> >  You know how you sometimes get a quick impression, or a phrase comes to
> >mind. When reading about 17 uncontrolled cash boxes the word "audit"
popped
> >right up.  I hope it doesn't occur to anyone at the Internal Revenue
> >Service.
> >
> >
> >Gerald
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Russ Volberding" <russvolb at earthlink.net>
> >To: <husker at tssi.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 7:19 AM
> >Subject: Fwd: [Husker] CU slush fund
> >
> >
> > > Thanks for the link.  You know how you sometimes get a quick
impression,
> >or
> > > a phrase comes to mind, when reading an article?  The phrase "loss of
> > > institutional control" popped right up.  I hope it doesn't occur to
anyone
> > > at the NCAA offices.
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker