[Husker] Joe Dailey (fwd)

[todd strong]

Scott......you said the word "option" in your post.
No soup for YOU!

"Would the boy I was yesterday, be proud of the man I am today?"
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Lawson" <SLawson at uamail.albany.edu>
To: "'Mike Nolan'" <nolan at romaine.tssi.com>; <husker at romaine.tssi.com>
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 7:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Husker] Joe Dailey (fwd)


>I for one am a little skeptical of the source, although I probably agree
> that Dailey may not be the starter in the Fall. I'm certainly not a 
> skilled
> journalist (although that was my minor), but the author seems to make a 
> few
> assumptions that would be tough to prove in that article. For all we know,
> Dailey could be the best option in the Fall, regardless of what people 
> think
> about Taylor and Beck at the levels they've been at.
>
> Scott in NY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: husker-bounces at tssi.com [mailto:husker-bounces at tssi.com]On Behalf
> Of Mike Nolan
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 8:33 PM
> To: husker at romaine.tssi.com
> Subject: [Husker] Joe Dailey (fwd)
>
>
>> The Rag pronounces Dailey DOA.
>>
> http://nebraska.statepaper.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2005/02/07/420774249575a
>> Dick Karre
>
> Yeah, but the writers at the Rag had had their way back around 1990,
> Tom Osborne would have been fired.
>
> Which of the new QBs are on campus now and will get a chance to show their
> stuff in spring drills?
> --
> Mike Nolan
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>