[Husker] Turnaround? Food for thought!

[j j]

Yeah only this year we are losing to the weakling
teams also. Anyone still think KSU has more talent
then NU. The only team we have lost to this year that
had a considerable amount of more talent was OU. We
should be 8-2 or 9-1 right now and looking forward to
a rematch with OU not hoping to beat CU just to go
bowling. Nothing anyone can say will change my mind
that this season has been one big disappointment. 
--- Bob Beach <rrbeach at rrbeach.com> wrote:

> Kurt Holst wrote:
> 
> >>
> >> Did you mean a "downtrodden" 10-3 team?   That is
> the record of the 
> >> team Callahan inherited, not 7-7.  A 360 degree
> turnaround, back to 
> >> 10-3, two years from now (2006) would be
> considered a successful 
> >> season and allow Callahan to keep his job, in my
> opinion.
> >
> >      
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>      Now if you want to get technical this is what
> Callahan inherited.
> 
> 
> "The Huskers haven't won or played for a Big 12
> title since 1999. They 
> stumbled into the 2001 national championship Rose
> Bowl game against 
> Miami after a 62-36 loss to Colorado. They were
> 16-12 in Solich's last 
> 28 games, including 1-7 against teams in the Top 25.
> 
> Last year's 9-3 record was cushioned with wins at
> home over weaklings 
> such as Utah State and Troy State. Solich's fate was
> sealed by a 38-9 
> home loss to unranked Kansas State."
> 
> 
> Bob Beach
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! 
http://my.yahoo.com