[Husker] 2005 NU Football Schedule Set

[todd strong]

Good post Mike. Not only people not wanting to deal with Pederson, but now 
ESPN has got to be irked too. Why on this green earth would Pederson not 
think about the future with ESPN? I just don't understand it, he's a 
Nebraska boy!

"Would the boy I was yesterday, be proud of the man I am today?"
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Jaixen" <mikejaixen at yahoo.com>
To: "Bob Beach" <rrbeach at rrbeach.com>; <husker at tssi.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Husker] 2005 NU Football Schedule Set


> At first, I agreed with that assessment, but in
> today's Omaha World-Herald, it was reported that the
> Houston contrace was a 2-for-1 deal.  So yes, while we
> gain a home game in 2005, we lose 2 home games in 2006
> and 2009.   Nebraska must now find 2 more home games
> for those years, which probably means 2 more I-AA
> teams in those seasons.
>
> Remember, with the stadium expansion scheduled to be
> completed in 2006, a home game in 2006 will be worth
> about $200,000 more than a home game in 2005.
>
> If we end up going on the road to fill one of the 2006
> and 2009 slots, we'll actually lose money in the end.
>
> Not to mention yet another stain on Pederson's
> integrity.  (Yes, there was no signed contract, but
> there was Pederson's word.  Which, once again, has
> been shown to be absolutely worthless.  How many
> organizations will want to deal with Pederson now on
> contracts?)
>
> --- Bob Beach <rrbeach at rrbeach.com> wrote:
>
>>      Gary Fead nailed it in his post.  The logic is
>> MONEY.  We gain a whole lot more money by playing a
>> home game.
>
> =====
> Mike Jaixen
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
> _______________________________________________
> husker site list
> husker at tssi.com
> http://romaine.tssi.com/mailman/listinfo/husker
>